<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung BlackJack III &#8211; forget it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/</link>
	<description>The Windows Mobile Smartphone news and opinion source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:24:11 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Is the Samsung SGH-i788 a likely successor? &#124; My Samsung Epix</title>
		<link>http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Samsung SGH-i788 a likely successor? &#124; My Samsung Epix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/?p=90#comment-475</guid>
		<description>[...] contends that the SGH-i788 is in fact a very UNLIKELY candidate for the next Blackjack III.The gist of TamWMS&#8217;s argument is Windows Mobile Standard (non-touchscreen) and Windows Mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contends that the SGH-i788 is in fact a very UNLIKELY candidate for the next Blackjack III.The gist of TamWMS&#8217;s argument is Windows Mobile Standard (non-touchscreen) and Windows Mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/?p=90#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Hello,
thank you so much for talking back.

For now, I stick to my prognosis - but we&#039;ll all know more soon ;).

All the best
Tam Hanna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
thank you so much for talking back.</p>
<p>For now, I stick to my prognosis &#8211; but we&#8217;ll all know more soon <img src='http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>All the best<br />
Tam Hanna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blackjack 3 &#187; Is The Samsung SGH-i788 A Likely Successor?</title>
		<link>http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blackjack 3 &#187; Is The Samsung SGH-i788 A Likely Successor?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/?p=90#comment-391</guid>
		<description>[...] contends that the SGH-i788 is in fact a very UNLIKELY candidate for the next Blackjack 3.The gist of TamWMS&#8217;s argument is Windows Mobile Standard (non-touchscreen) and Windows Mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contends that the SGH-i788 is in fact a very UNLIKELY candidate for the next Blackjack 3.The gist of TamWMS&#8217;s argument is Windows Mobile Standard (non-touchscreen) and Windows Mobile [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emp29</title>
		<link>http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/06/20/samsung-blackjack-iii-forget-it/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>emp29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/?p=90#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I could definitely see AT&amp;T transitioning the Blackjack line from WM Standard (non-touchscreen) to WM Pro (touchscreen) with this phone. 
The WM Standard phones are a dying breed and Samsung needs to move it very popular Blackjack line to the world of touchscreen - the i788 is the perfect phone to do this with. It still keeps in line with the aesthetics of the Blackjack 1 and 2 but is forward looking with the touchscreen and myriad of new features. Also, check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myblackjack3.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;myblackjack3.com&lt;/a&gt; for more info on the possible blackjack 3 release by ATT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could definitely see AT&amp;T transitioning the Blackjack line from WM Standard (non-touchscreen) to WM Pro (touchscreen) with this phone.<br />
The WM Standard phones are a dying breed and Samsung needs to move it very popular Blackjack line to the world of touchscreen &#8211; the i788 is the perfect phone to do this with. It still keeps in line with the aesthetics of the Blackjack 1 and 2 but is forward looking with the touchscreen and myriad of new features. Also, check out <a href="http://www.myblackjack3.com" rel="nofollow">myblackjack3.com</a> for more info on the possible blackjack 3 release by ATT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
